[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Does svn merge --reintegrate ^URL syntax really work ?

From: LiuYan 刘研 <lovetide_at_21cn.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 01:05:22 -0700 (PDT)

Thank you Daniel!

I've reported it to svnbook list here:
http://code.google.com/p/svnbook/issues/detail?id=97

Daniel Shahaf-2 wrote:
>
> LiuYan 刘研 wrote on Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 00:19:54 -0700:
>>
>> Thank you Erik,
>>
>> 1. I think I got the cause:
>> I use Subversion in windows system, it's a little different to linux/unix
>> system:
>> The ^ character is a special character in command prompt window or batch
>> file. the ^ character and it's following characters MUST be quoted:
>
> Or doubled: ^^/trunk . And this is documented.
>
>> E:\Incoming\svntest\calc\branches\new-branch>svn list ^/
>> svn: '\' is not a working copy
>> E:\Incoming\svntest\calc\branches\new-branch>svn list "^/"
>> calc/
>> paint/
>> tools/
>>
>>
>> 2. But,
>> beause ^ means "the URL of the repository's root directory”, why svn-book
>> use ^/trunk instead of ^/calc/trunk ?
>>
>
> It seems the book is inconsistent on whether 'calc' is a repository or
> a directory inside a repository. Could you report this to the svnbook
> list please?
>
>

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Does-svn-merge---reintegrate-%5EURL-syntax-really-work---tp29673121p29695674.html
Sent from the Subversion Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on 2010-09-13 10:05:58 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.