[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: SVN "Relay"

From: Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2010b_at_ryandesign.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 05:27:46 -0500

On Aug 2, 2010, at 05:16, Istace Emmanuel wrote:

> Ok, but that's not what i we at work. The local svn will be a "working copy"
> of the external svn. In fact, no user have to use the external svn if
> there's a local svn. The goal of this is the limit the access to the WAN. If
> the external svn is sync twice per day, we can limit these access and
> decrease the commit time for internal user (we have no external user). A LAN
> commit is faster than a WAN commit (the bandwith is lower for wan) And we
> can have a better security, we have no control on what's do on the WAN with
> our data and many commit from LAN to WAN are "point of access to private
> data" (SSL or not, ssl is not a good security, you can spoof him easily). We
> can limit this risk by limitting the data who are sent.

Ok, then I don't think svnsync will help. That's not how it works (and I don't know of anything that does work that way for Subversion, but I haven't done an exhaustive search).
Received on 2010-08-02 12:28:30 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.