Re: Unclear syntax for relative addressing of svn:externals, on RHEL 5, subversion-1.6.12

On 7/12/2010 4:57 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> I understand that, and can understand that the peg revisions demanded
> a new syntax.

I realize that this is barely related to the topic, but is there any
common scenario where you wouldn't want to use peg revision syntax? In
every situation I can imagine where -r rev path and path_at_rev might
differ, the one I'd want would be path_at_rev.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell_at_gmail.com