[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Strange status if .svn folder removed

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 01:14:19 +0300 (Jerusalem Daylight Time)

> > > "deeply nested" usually means only 10-15 folders. Recursing up to find
> > the
> > > root of the working copy is a one-time operation during the course of an
> > > invocation of 'svn' on that working copy. As such, it's essentially a
> > free
> > > operation.
> > >
> >
> > How would recursing interact with symlinks into working copy dirs?
> > (I know we it have been discussed before; a pointer would be appreciated)
> >
> > eg:
> >
> > svn co $SVN_TRUNK trunk
> > ln -s trunk/notes notes
> > cd notes
> > svn st
> >
>
> Isn't this just a subset of the "severable working copy" use case?
>

i.e., if I don't run 'svn sever trunk/notes', the above will just fail
with "svn: 'notes' is not a working copy"?

> -Hyrum
>
Received on 2010-05-28 00:14:05 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.