[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: SVN merge issue in Solaris

From: Kadam, Shailesh <Shailesh.Kadam_at_westernasset.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:01:05 -0700

Hi Johan, We are running on solaris zone and able to run truss on the process, we see majority of time svn spends is in reading the .svn/entries file again and again. Why is that. Thanks Sal getcwd("/opt/projects/common_services/rjm/autsys-workspace/workspace/merge_test/MERGE_TEST", 1024) = 0 open("/opt/projects/common_services/rjm/autsys-workspace/workspace/merge_test/MERGE_TEST/.svn/entries", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 6 fcntl(6, F_GETFD, 0x00000000) = 0 fcntl(6, F_SETFD, 0x00000001) = 0 read(6, " 1 0\n\n d i r\n 4 5 3\n".., 80) = 80 close(6) = 0 open("/opt/projects/common_services/rjm/autsys-workspace/workspace/merge_test/MERGE_TEST/.svn/entries", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 6 fcntl(6, F_GETFD, 0x00000000) = 0 fcntl(6, F_SETFD, 0x00000001) = 0 read(6, " 1 0\n\n d i r\n 4 5 3\n".., 4096) = 4096 read(6, "\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n".., 4096) = 4096 read(6, " 2 0 c f 9 d d 6 a\n 2 0".., 4096) = 4096 read(6, " 4 1 8 8 8 8 e b 3 0 d a".., 4096) = 4096 read(6, "\n\n 8 9 7\n\f\n A S I A".., 4096) = 4096 read(6, " 1 1 . 9 1 8 7 9 9 Z\n e".., 4096) = 4096 read(6, "\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n".., 4096) = 4096 read(6, "\n\n\n 2 0 1 0 - 0 5 - 2".., 4096) = 4096 read(6, " M _ P D S _ S E N D _ P".., 4096) = 4096 read(6, "\n 6\n c o n t r o l d e".., 4096) = 4096 read(6, " 1 0 - 0 4 - 2 2 T 0 3 :".., 4096) = 4096 read(6, "\n 2 0 1 0 - 0 5 - 2 6 T".., 4096) = 4096 read(6, " 5 : 5 0 . 0 1 2 8 9 2 Z".., 4096) = 4096 read(6, " 2 0 1 0 - 0 5 - 2 6 T 1".., 4096) = 4096 read(6, " a c 5 f c 8 0 6 2 1 7 7".., 4096) = 4096 read(6, "\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n".., 4096) = 4096 -----Original Message----- From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcorvel_at_gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 1:57 PM To: Liu, Xiaodu "Louie" Cc: users_at_subversion.apache.org; Kadam, Shailesh Subject: Re: SVN merge issue in Solaris On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Liu, Xiaodu "Louie" <XiaoduLouie.Liu_at_westernasset.com> wrote: > We have the svn merge performance issue on Solaris.  For a given repo, > if we do svn merge on windows box, it takes about 35 seconds, but same > merge will take about 6 minutes. > > Both svn version 1.6.6 and 1.6.11 clients are tested with the same issues. There could be lots of differences between both (client) systems. If network connectivity to the repository is the same, I would take a look at the filesystem where the working copy is stored (where you are merging into). For instance, if your working copy on the Solaris box is on a remote filesystem mounted via NFS, or Samba, compared to the Windows box having its working copy on a fast local drive, that could explain the difference. Keep in mind that Subversion stores its working-copy metadata currently in lots of little files in lots of .svn subdirectories in every directory. Some svn operations are therefor very heavy on I/O. E.g. for most operations (merge, update, commit, ...) the working copy needs to be locked, and after the operation unlocked. This is done by putting (and removing) little lock files in all those .svn directories. SVN's next release (1.7, slated for release late summer) will be much better in this area, because its metadata will be centralized in one single database at the root of the working copy. Cheers, -- Johan ********************************************************************** E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Western Asset therefore recommends that you do not send any confidential or sensitive information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers, account numbers, or personal identification numbers. Delivery, and or timely delivery of Internet mail is not guaranteed. Western Asset therefore recommends that you do not send time sensitive or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail. **********************************************************************
Received on 2010-05-26 23:11:54 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.