Hi Andy,
> venture to disturb you, would like to ask, why do not
> directly generate Subversion Binary Packages, as Tigris.org
> the DJ Heap, Branko Čibej and Troy Simpson them Which will
> lead, direct compilation with Apache modules can be attached
> to it? Because we own the development process may already
> contain a local Apache, and third-party development mode
> which can not DJ they just single hook into Apache, so you
> can go to a lot of trouble. Wish you were able to find time
> to reply to my right? Thanks very much.
>
If you search the mailing list this has been covered quite a lot recently. Remember that binary packages are not 'part of the package' but are greated by volunteers in their own time.
DJ suffered a failure of his build system that he no longer has the time available to fix.
Further searching of the list may well lead you to the following:
> I have built both 1.6.9 and 1.6.11
> They are available on my webpage http://alagazam.net
> You (and anyone else) is welcome to download and use it.
>
> The reason I've not announced the release in this (users) list
> is that I've hoped some people reading the dev list (where I
> did announce it) to download and test it first so I know my
> build environment is okey. As the web page says all test on
> subversion itself is running ok., but the bindings has not been
> tested.
>
> /David
~ mark c
Received on 2010-05-24 10:33:11 CEST