> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Darj [mailto:zid_at_alagazam.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2010 6:26 AM
> > To: Cooke, Mark
> > Cc: users_at_subversion.apache.org; Troy Simpson
> > Subject: Re: Tigris binary packages for Windows
> >
> > On 2010-04-26 13:58, Cooke, Mark wrote:
> > > Hi David, list,
> > >
> > >
> > >>>>> On 2010-04-22 17:06, Cooke, Mark wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I am resurrecting this thread to ask if anyone has come
> > >>>>> forward to volunteer time and/or effort to resurrect the
> > >>>>> windoze binaries as we are still on 1.6.6 against 1.6.11
> > >>>>> announced a few days ago.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> From: David Darj [mailto:zid_at_alagazam.net]
> > >>>> Sent: 22 April 2010 21:21
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I have built both 1.6.9 and 1.6.11
> > >>>> They are available on my webpage http://alagazam.net
> > >>>> You (and anyone else) is welcome to download and use it.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The reason I've not announced the release in this (users)
> > >>>> list is that I've hoped some people reading the dev list
> > >>>> (where I did announce it) to download and test it first so
> > >>>> I know my build environment is okey.
> > >>>> As the web page says all test on subversion itself is running
> > >>>> ok., but the bindings has not been tested.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> On 2010-04-23 10:29, Cooke, Mark wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> You star! Thanks very much. I will do some testing with
> > >>> apache 2.2 on windoze using mod_dav_svn and python bindings
> > >>> (to Trac using mod_wsgi) and report back...
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> From: David Darj [mailto:zid_at_alagazam.net]
> > >> Sent: 23 April 2010 18:08
> > >>
> > >> Thanx that would be gr8.
> > >>
> > > So far so good. Minor points but the ".11" package readme still
> > refers
> > > to ".9"
> > Oh...thats my fault missing to change the version number in
> some spots.
> > I think I was focused on getting the dependecies versions right.
> > > and some of the files have a different name format from the
> > > tigris packages, e.g.:
> > >
> > > o svn-python-1.6.6.win32-py2.6.exe
> > > o svn-win32-1.6.11_py.zip
> > >
> > > ...although I realise one is an installer and the other just the
> > files.
> > >
> > You're right, the first one is an installer and the second
> one only the
> > files.
> > If you look at tigris download page a bit further down you see the
> > corresponding zip-file there as well.
> > I've just havn't looked into byinding these installers.
> > > Actually, I am unsure about installing the latter, can I just copy
> > the
> > > files over the ones I already have installed or do I need to tell
> > python
> > > about it somehow (probably OT for this list I guess,
> perhaps Troy is
> > > listening)?
> > >
> > I'm not a python programmer so I don't really know how to
> install this
> > package (thats why the bindings are not tested).
> > But I suppose you can just extract the file over the old ones.
> > Actually it's not Troy that used to build the python
> installers, it was
> > DJ Heap, who also used to build the binaries.
> > Maybe he has some info on this matter.
> > >
> > >>> Out of interest, did you use VC6 or VC2008 to compile
> (there were
> > >>> suggestions earlier in the thread that there might be some
> > potential
> > >>> issues using VC2008 binaries against the official apache build
> > which
> > >>>
> > > I
> > >
> > >>> am required to use here):
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> It's built using the good old VC6 like D.J Heap previously did.
> > >> That way no runtime-dll:s (msvcr*) needs to be
> distributed with it.
> > >>
> > >>
> > > Excellent, thanks again.
> > >
> > >
> > >>> Also, did you hook up with Troy about the installers ~ I
> > >>> assume that he would be able to put them on tigris at least
> > >>> until we get a new home on apache:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> I havn't had any contact with troy, but this mail is cc:d to
> > >> him as well. So if he is reading it it would be great if he
> > >> (or anyone else) want to put the there.
> > >>
> > >>
> > > It would be really great if Troy could pick up the baton
> here as that
> > > would negate my python install issues.
> > >
> > > All the best,
> > >
> > > ~ mark c
> > >
> >
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Troy Simpson [mailto:troy_at_ebswift.com]
> Sent: 09 May 2010 23:47
>
> Looks like we're getting closer to official binaries then...
> As far as the python bindings installer goes, that's something
> I know nothing about. I have new code for the windows WiX-based
> installer, but thus far haven't had any commit access to place
> the code back in. The WiX code in the repository has 'issues'.
>
> Regards,
>
> Troy
>
I will try to investigate the python issue but its probably not going to
be this week *sigh*
~ mark c
Received on 2010-05-10 10:45:35 CEST