[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: proposed export option

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:48:28 +0300 (Jerusalem Daylight Time)

(+1 to what Ryan and Stefan said already)

Paul Breen wrote on Tue, 27 Apr 2010 at 01:57 -0700:
> My client is aware of rsync utility, but would prefer to use svn. I'll
> have to correspond with her to find out why she doesn't want to use
> rsync. As far as making the remote deployment a working folder and
> using svn update, she doesn't want to have the clutter of the hidden
> .svn folders on the deployed computers.

$ svn update $local_wc
$ rsync --exclude=.svn $local_wc/ $deployment_site/
Received on 2010-04-27 18:48:15 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.