On 2010-04-26 13:58, Cooke, Mark wrote:
> Hi David, list,
>
>
>>>>> On 2010-04-22 17:06, Cooke, Mark wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am resurrecting this thread to ask if anyone has come
>>>>> forward to volunteer time and/or effort to resurrect the
>>>>> windoze binaries as we are still on 1.6.6 against 1.6.11
>>>>> announced a few days ago.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> From: David Darj [mailto:zid_at_alagazam.net]
>>>> Sent: 22 April 2010 21:21
>>>>
>>>> I have built both 1.6.9 and 1.6.11
>>>> They are available on my webpage http://alagazam.net
>>>> You (and anyone else) is welcome to download and use it.
>>>>
>>>> The reason I've not announced the release in this (users)
>>>> list is that I've hoped some people reading the dev list
>>>> (where I did announce it) to download and test it first so
>>>> I know my build environment is okey.
>>>> As the web page says all test on subversion itself is running
>>>> ok., but the bindings has not been tested.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> On 2010-04-23 10:29, Cooke, Mark wrote:
>>>
>>> You star! Thanks very much. I will do some testing with
>>> apache 2.2 on windoze using mod_dav_svn and python bindings
>>> (to Trac using mod_wsgi) and report back...
>>>
>>>
>> From: David Darj [mailto:zid_at_alagazam.net]
>> Sent: 23 April 2010 18:08
>>
>> Thanx that would be gr8.
>>
> So far so good. Minor points but the ".11" package readme still refers
> to ".9"
Oh...thats my fault missing to change the version number in some spots.
I think I was focused on getting the dependecies versions right.
> and some of the files have a different name format from the
> tigris packages, e.g.:
>
> o svn-python-1.6.6.win32-py2.6.exe
> o svn-win32-1.6.11_py.zip
>
> ...although I realise one is an installer and the other just the files.
>
You're right, the first one is an installer and the second one only the
files.
If you look at tigris download page a bit further down you see the
corresponding zip-file there as well.
I've just havn't looked into byinding these installers.
> Actually, I am unsure about installing the latter, can I just copy the
> files over the ones I already have installed or do I need to tell python
> about it somehow (probably OT for this list I guess, perhaps Troy is
> listening)?
>
I'm not a python programmer so I don't really know how to install this
package (thats why the bindings are not tested).
But I suppose you can just extract the file over the old ones.
Actually it's not Troy that used to build the python installers, it was
DJ Heap, who also used to build the binaries.
Maybe he has some info on this matter.
>
>>> Out of interest, did you use VC6 or VC2008 to compile (there were
>>> suggestions earlier in the thread that there might be some potential
>>> issues using VC2008 binaries against the official apache build which
>>>
> I
>
>>> am required to use here):
>>>
>>>
>> It's built using the good old VC6 like D.J Heap previously did.
>> That way no runtime-dll:s (msvcr*) needs to be distributed with it.
>>
>>
> Excellent, thanks again.
>
>
>>> Also, did you hook up with Troy about the installers ~ I
>>> assume that he would be able to put them on tigris at least
>>> until we get a new home on apache:
>>>
>>>
>> I havn't had any contact with troy, but this mail is cc:d to
>> him as well. So if he is reading it it would be great if he
>> (or anyone else) want to put the there.
>>
>>
> It would be really great if Troy could pick up the baton here as that
> would negate my python install issues.
>
> All the best,
>
> ~ mark c
>
Received on 2010-04-26 22:19:39 CEST