Re: JavaHL - when using peg makes the difference in diffSummarize()

Hi, yes I've read it and the examples there in the "Peg and Operative Revisions" section make sense. Yet, I do not know any answer to my question bellow. Can you provide me just one example in which passing and not passing a peg revision to diffSummarize() returns a different response? Maybe this is easy for you as I'm new to JavaHL Thanks Mário ----- Original Message ---- From: Jon Foster <Jon.Foster@cabot.co.uk> To: m g <mljrg@yahoo.com> Cc: SubversionUsers <users@subversion.apache.org> Sent: Fri, April 23, 2010 6:16:49 PM Subject: RE: JavaHL - when using peg makes the difference in diffSummarize() Hi, "m g" wrote: > Subject: JavaHL - when using peg makes the difference in diffSummarize() > > can you provide me at least one case in which passing > a non-null peg revision to SVNClientInterface.diffSummarize() > returns a different result than when passing null ? > > Thanks > Mário Have you read the SVN book? http://svnbook.red-bean.com/ It has a good explanation of peg revisions. Kind regards, Jon -- Please direct all replies to the mailing list. ********************************************************************** This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Cabot Communications Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient of this email and its attachments, you must take no action based upon them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Cabot Communications Limited Verona House, Filwood Road, Bristol BS16 3RY, UK +44 (0) 1179584232 Co. Registered in England number 02817269 Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. ********************************************************************** ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
Received on 2010-04-23 19:49:58 CEST