On 2010-04-23 10:29, Cooke, Mark wrote:
>>> On 2010-04-22 17:06, Cooke, Mark wrote:
>>>
>>> I am resurrecting this thread to ask if anyone has come
>>> forward to volunteer time and/or effort to resurrect the
>>> windoze binaries as we are still on 1.6.6 against 1.6.11
>>> announced a few days ago.
>>>
>>>
>> From: David Darj [mailto:zid_at_alagazam.net]
>> Sent: 22 April 2010 21:21
>>
>> I have built both 1.6.9 and 1.6.11
>> They are available on my webpage http://alagazam.net
>> You (and anyone else) is welcome to download and use it.
>>
>> The reason I've not announced the release in this (users)
>> list is that I've hoped some people reading the dev list
>> (where I did announce it) to download and test it first so
>> I know my build environment is okey.
>> As the web page says all test on subversion itself is running
>> ok., but the bindings has not been tested.
>>
>>
> You star! Thanks very much. I will do some testing with apache 2.2 on
> windoze using mod_dav_svn and python bindings (to Trac using mod_wsgi)
> and report back...
>
>
Thanx that would be gr8.
> Out of interest, did you use VC6 or VC2008 to compile (there were
> suggestions earlier in the thread that there might be some potential
> issues using VC2008 binaries against the official apache build which I
> am required to use here):
>
>
It's built using the good old VC6 like D.J Heap previously did.
That way no runtime-dll:s (msvcr*) needs to be distributed with it.
>> From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markphip_at_gmail.com]
>> Sent: 03 March 2010 14:27
>> One other "pain" I thought of is that ideally the binaries
>> should be built using MSVC 6.0 (I am assuming DJ has not
>> changed that). Since the httpd binaries are built using that
>> you can have problems if a newer Visual Studio is used for
>> mod_dav_svn. You also have to deal with distributing the MS
>> runtime libraries if a newer version is used.
>>
> Also, did you hook up with Troy about the installers ~ I assume that he
> would be able to put them on tigris at least until we get a new home on
> apache:
>
>
I havn't had any contact with troy, but this mail is cc:d to him as well.
So if he is reading it it would be great if he (or anyone else) want to
put the there.
>> From: Troy Simpson [mailto:troy_at_ebswift.com]
>> Sent: 02 March 2010 02:45
>>
>> I can still build the installer, but I have never built
>> binaries. The installer code in the repository is NOT the
>> latest code. I had lost commit access for a time during the
>> transition and by the time I got that access back there are
>> no more binaries, so it has been pointless to continue
>> development. If someone could produce binaries I could get
>> the installer back on track, otherwise it's not worth
>> spending any time on if the project will not support (as in
>> supply) windows binaries.
>>
> ~ mark c
>
/David
Received on 2010-04-23 19:00:22 CEST