Hi,
users-return-1912-Ullrich.Jans=elektrobit.com_at_subversion.apach e.org
wrote:
> Subject: RE: svnadmin create not honoring sticky bit
>
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:16:50PM +0200,
>> Ullrich.Jans_at_elektrobit.com wrote:
>
>>> ls -l test1/db/rep-cache.db test2/db/rep-cache.db
>>> -rw-r-----+ 1 root www 4096 2010-03-30 14:07
>>> test1/db/rep-cache.db
>>> -rw-r-----+ 1 username users 4096 2010-03-30 14:07
>>> test2/db/rep-cache.db
>>
>> See http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3437
>
> I know about that one. (That's why I mentioned it in my original mail)
>
> What's new (to me) is the permissions on *all* the files in
> db (just one example from db to keep the email short):
>
> drwxrws---+ 3 root www 4096 2010-03-30 14:07 test1/db/revs
> drwxrwx---+ 3 username users 4096 2010-03-30 14:07 test2/db/revs
>
> Looking at the main directory shows that the sticky bit on db
> got dropped:
>
> ls -l test2
> total 48
> drwxrws---+ 2 username www 4096 2010-03-30 14:07 conf
> drwxrwx---+ 6 username www 4096 2010-03-30 14:07 db
> ^here
> -r--r-----+ 1 username www 2 2010-03-30 14:07 format
> drwxrws---+ 2 username www 4096 2010-03-30 14:07 hooks
> drwxrws---+ 2 username www 4096 2010-03-30 14:07 locks
> -rw-rw----+ 1 username www 229 2010-03-30 14:07 README.txt
>
> Occurred on svn 1.6.9 (package from the Suse Buildservice):
>
> subversion-1.6.9-4.3
> subversion-perl-1.6.9-4.3
> subversion-tools-1.6.9-4.3
> subversion-server-1.6.9-4.3
Any ideas on that one? Should I open an issue in the tracker?
Cheers,
Ulli
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please note: This e-mail may contain confidential information
intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please do not disclose it to anyone, notify
the sender promptly, and delete the message from your system.
Thank you.
Received on 2010-03-31 16:41:29 CEST