Re: weird merge

On Mar 30, 2010, at 18:55, Xavier Noria wrote:

> Can I tell to svn that it totally forget revisions < 3000 ?

Doing so is a very invasive procedure. I don't recommend it. It's likely to cause more problems than it solves.

> Those are
> very old and we could just get rid of them it there was a chance that
> it solved the issue, it is a pity we need to deal with explicit
> revisions all the time, reflective merges...
>
> I don't know, perhaps around r2909 people did something with the repo,
> upgrading, ... no idea.
Received on 2010-03-31 02:16:44 CEST