> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Tyler Roscoe <tyler_at_cryptio.net> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:17:54PM +0100, Xavier Noria wrote:
> >> Even if I try to fix it by hand with
> >>
> >> svn merge -r2:2909 ^/trunk --record-only
> >>
> >> a subsequent merge still tries to get 2 through 2909. Moreover
Did you do a commit after doing the --record-only merge?
BOb
> >>
> >> svn propget svn:mergeinfo .
> >>
> >> returns nothing.
> >
> > Are you using a merge-capable client and server (svn >= 1.5.0)?
>
> Yes, server is 1.5.1 (r32289) and client is 1.6.5 (r38866).
>
> > What does svn say after you perform the record-only merge? Nothing?
>
> Nothing, silent.
>
> >> Another fact is that svn log in the branch contains everything down to
> r1.
> >
> > What about svn log --stop-on-copy?
> >
> > When was your branch created (what revision)?
>
> I am doing ad-hoc tests with temporary branches I can throw. For
> example the last one was created from trunk r28935 and now trunk is
> r28939.
>
> Indeed if you want me to try something please just tell me, I can
> create whatever, test stuff and delete later.
>
> I don't know whether this is relevant, but we are not creating the
> branches exactly below the branches directory, but in a subdirectory
> of it.
Received on 2010-03-30 16:24:24 CEST