[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn 1.6x and apache compression - mod_deflate

From: Leszek Szarlej <leszek.szarlej_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:06:33 +0100

That would be strange for me as far as it looks for Accept-Encoding: gzip
header

 I've checked current day:
bash-3.2$ cat access_log.2010-03-10 |grep TortoiseSVN-1.5 |wc -l
1077

I revieved some of them and most of them have resp code
200 or 207
207 Multi-Status (WebDAV) (RFC 4918)

There is also variable to put in custom log for logging if client accepts
compression.
I think I will test it.

Regards
Leszek

On 10 March 2010 18:31, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Do a checkout or command using a SVN client that does not have deflate
> support. For example, the TortoiseSVN 1.5.x clients. As soon as you
> do this, your server will probably crash.
>
> When the SVN clients have deflate support it all works great. The bug
> happens when a client without support hits the server. This could
> also include command line tools like wget.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Leszek Szarlej
> <leszek.szarlej_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi I am sharing with you my results of running with mod_deflate and svn
> > 1.9.9 for ~13 hours. I hope attachments works here.. see attached file
> >
> > The load of the server decreased but there were also other changes
> applied
> > in the same time like LDAP cache or ServerTokens PROD
> >
> > To this time mod_deflate works very efficiently without notificable
> > burden of server.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Leszek
> >
> > On 9 March 2010 17:33, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 05:10:11PM +0100, Leszek Szarlej wrote:
> >> > Thanks for the info.
> >> > >See http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2009-08/0274.shtml
> >> > In mentioned example apache runs on worker mpm. I've sent a message to
> >> > this
> >> > group few days ago about users experience with svn and worker mpm. I
> >> > didn't
> >> > get any answer.
> >>
> >> Can you provide a link to this message so it's easy to find it and to
> >> reply to it?
> >> The archives are at
> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/
> >>
> >> > It concerns me if svn is thread-safe and if the said memory
> >> > problem would appear on prefork mpm. I will be doing some tests this
> >> > week.
> >>
> >> Thanks, tests always help and give insight.
> >>
> >> Note that the problem is not specific to svn. If I understand correctly
> >> it's a problem with mod_deflate. It's possible to work around it in
> >> Subversion, but a proper fix would have to be made within mod_deflate.
> >>
> >> I don't know what the status of this bug is with the httpd team,
> >> whether it's known there, or if a fix is in sight.
> >> The fix seems to be important to you, so maybe you could ask them?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Stefan
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Mark Phippard
> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>
Received on 2010-03-10 20:07:05 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.