RE: SVN Copy
From: Ramachandran, Vishwanath(IE10) <Vishwanath.Ramachandran_at_Honeywell.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:57:40 +0530
Thanks for the reply. You suggest to go for Merge instead of Copy?
From: Michael P. Reilly [mailto:arcege_at_gmail.com]
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Ramachandran, Vishwanath(IE10)
In a subversion working copy(XYZ), we are doing development in different
There are different branches which are having different version of XYZ
Currently we want to merge XYZ 1.2 version of branch to TRUNK.
So instead of merge, we thought of doing COPY, because merge will take
So for COPY, we are planning to do the following steps.
1) Move the TRUNK to a TAG using the SVN MOVE command.
(2) Copy the XYZ_1.2.0_BUILD24_RELEASE_RC1 TAG to the TRUNK.
No need to do an explicit delete/commit on the trunk because svn move
Please review the steps and let us know, if its fine in terms of
You will not retain the history on the trunk. The history breaks at the
My first reaction to what you are trying to do is EWWWWW. You're
My suggestion to you is to clone the repository and try it out. Then
-- There's so many different worlds, So many different suns. And we have just one world, But we live in different ones.Received on 2010-03-08 15:28:29 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.