On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:11:13AM -0500, Keith Theman wrote:
> Thank you for the clarification. Very helpful.
> Not being a member of the subversion voting elite, what is the
> probability (polling?) that this bug will be fixed in 1.6.10?
The height of the backport voting season happens when Hyrum
announces that he's thinking about making a new release.
Issue #3242 is important enough that I'd expect many developers
to strongly consider reviewing it once 1.6.10 is near (myself included).
The fix already has two votes and needs just one more vote to make
> If this bug is not fixed, then I will have no other recourse but to
> move to mecurial. Bummer I really like svn.
Mercurial is nice, too. But afaik it does not have path-based authz,
so I wonder why you'd consider Mercurial if you need authz so much
that you care about issue #3242?
Received on 2010-03-02 15:28:02 CET