Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> Did I miss something in the original problem description? Is that precisely
>> what is being attempted here and yet it's not working?
> That is my understanding:
> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 22:15 -0800, Alexey Neyman wrote:
>> It seems that I encountered a bug in 'svnlook pl --revprop': it fails with
>> the following message:
>> $ svnlook pl --revprop -t 10547-86b /svn/test-svn
>> svnlook: Invalid revision number '-1'
> I can replicate this error message with svn 1.6.9 on Mac OS X. "svnlook
> pl -t" works fine, but "svnlook pl --revprop -t" complains that revision number
> '-1' is invalid, though I specified a correct in-progress transaction number.
Okay -- sorry for the noise, then. That was my fault for not parsing the
Yes, this I believe this is a bug. (I'll even grant that using an option
named "--revprops" does nothing for the illusion that revisions aren't
really just "special transactions".)
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2010-03-01 19:27:41 CET