Re: Infamous "Item is not readable" for svn log
From: David Brodbeck <brodbd_at_u.washington.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:44:12 -0800
On Feb 26, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
That's how we're doing it on our repository. It's a little clumsy, but workable for our user population.
> Baring that setting up apache for anon requests and svn for authenticated.
That would also work. In our case we didn't really want the added complexity of Apache -- plus I was worried about user confusion. I already have a fair number of people who get http: and svn: mixed up from time to time. Having http: work in some situations but not others would just add to their perplexity.
-- David Brodbeck System Administrator, Linguistics University of WashingtonReceived on 2010-02-26 23:45:14 CET |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.