Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Olivier Sannier<obones_at_free.fr> wrote:
>
>> I reread the svn book and it is not clear to me whether or not svn switch is
>> supposed to update a relative external.
>> To me it would be quite logical that it would, hence my surprise when I saw
>> the above behavior. Could it be that I missed something obvious?
>>
> I think this is a known bug. See
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3390
>
> It was recently fixed and proposed for backport to 1.6.x. It will
> probably, hopefully, most likely, ... be included in 1.6.10.
>
Ah yes, you are right, this is exactly the same bug, don't know why I
could not find it.
Well, let's hope it comes down in the next update to the 1.6 versions.
Regards
Olivier
Received on 2010-02-22 15:48:57 CET