[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Branch from a branch -- will merges still work?

From: Rob van Oostrum <rvanoo_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:22:36 -0500

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Jacob Weber <jacob_at_jacobweber.com> wrote:

>
> On Feb 18, 2010, at 8:00 AM, Rob van Oostrum wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Jacob Weber <jacob_at_jacobweber.com>wrote:
>
>> My concern is this:
>> After we reintegrate from A into trunk, we'll need to revert A to trunk
>> (according to my understanding of reintegrate merges.) So once we do that,
>> will we still be able to reintegrate from AA into A, or will their
>> connection be broken?
>>
>> Is there a better way to achieve the same result (being able to do new
>> development based on still-unreleased changes)?
>>
>>
> If you need to keep A around after reintegration to trunk, all you need to
> do is do a --record-only merge back to your branch to avoid merge conflicts
> (caused by the reintegration merge) when bringing in additional trunk
> changes.
>
> No reason your proposed solution couldn't work.
>
>
>
> Do you mean that I don't need to delete my branch after a reintegrate, as
> suggested here:
>
>
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.html#svn.branchemerge.basicmerging.reintegrate
>
> and that instead, I can just record the revision of the merge as having
> being merged into my branch?
>
> You may have just changed my life, sir. :)
>
> Jacob
>
>
You don't need to. The suggestion on that page is just that if you no longer
need the branch, it's perfectly safe to remove it (since you can always
resurrect it if need be).

Glad I could help!

R.
Received on 2010-02-18 17:23:13 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.