[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Expected release date of RedBean for 1.6

From: Ed <SVN_at_0x1b.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:23:49 -0700


It's a free book written mostly by those coding the project - check
out the repo and keep yourself up to date with cron.
I recommend the Vendor Branching feature. think of it as a teachable moment...

strange how a version control project keeps it's book in a repo....

no snivelling!

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Pat Farrell <pfarrell_at_pfarrell.com> wrote:
> Andy Levy wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 21:05, Pat Farrell <pfarrell_at_pfarrell.com> wrote:
>>> When will the 1.6 version, with all the "changed a lot" be part of the
>>> public website?
>> It's always been accessible, use the "nightly" version of the
>> documentation. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/index.html
> That is most definitely not what I asked.
> I have zero interest in pulling stuff from nightly SVN repositories.
> I am interested in production quality, ready to use in a professional
> development environment tools.
> While SVN seems to have an active support community, I'm not seeing
> parallel evidence of active support for the documentation.
> for example, in another thread, Mike Dixon wrote:
>> Uh? What's wrong with --reintegrate?
> Well for me, the 1.5 RedBean documentation for  --reintegrate
> is too vague to be useful.
> While I'm a pretty hard core geek, a bunch of the folks on my team are
> not. They need clear, up-to-date documentation.
> --
> Pat Farrell
> http://www.pfarrell.com/
Received on 2010-02-17 06:26:38 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.