[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Usage for svn list

From: Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2010a_at_ryandesign.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:23:59 -0600

On Jan 26, 2010, at 03:48, Felix Gilcher wrote:

> On Jan 26, 2010, at 2:26 AM, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
>> [snip] Is there a way to express the '-r {DATE}' syntax
>> with the "@" suffix? "@{2009-01-01}" seems to be ignored:
> [snip] A peg revision must be a revision number and cannot be a date [snip]

Agreed, but why is it that way? The desire to use a date seems just as valid in peg revision context as it is in operative revision context, so why does the operative revision syntax support it but the peg revision syntax doesn't?
Received on 2010-01-26 11:24:39 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.