Re: svn rm should be 'fixed'
From: Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:48:49 -0800
Plus it won't delete the file if there are local modifications in it.
I don't think the behavior is wrong, BTW. If I delete a file then I don't want
-- Blair Zajac, Ph.D. CTO, OrcaWare Technologies <blair_at_orcaware.com> Subversion training, consulting and support http://www.orcaware.com/svn/ Bob Archer wrote: > You can also use: > > > > svn rm --keep-local > > > > BOb > > > > > > *From:* Mahi Haile [mailto:begin.middle.end_at_gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, January 11, 2010 2:13 PM > *To:* users_at_subversion.apache.org > *Subject:* svn rm should be 'fixed' > > > > I really like svn. I use it everyday. > > > > But I really dislike 'svn rm', because I make the mistake everyday. I > always want to remove something from the repository and use it, but end > up deleting the file on the local machine. Especially bad when I just > added the file, or there are changes on it I have not saved yet. > > > > I have come to think of it more as a bug than a feature. I think 'svn > rm' should do just that -- rm from the repository rather than the local > file as well. > > > > Thank you, >Received on 2010-01-12 04:49:32 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.