[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion Histroy question

From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:16:41 +0100

> Anyway, I can understand Andreas' desire to clean out old history
> that's no longer needed, and that's only slowing things down. But
> sometimes, having that entire history is very useful, so we chose not
> to do that. Instead, we learned to live with the current limitations
> for now, and we hope they will be improved someday...

Ok. I see your problem now. Did you know you can restrict blame to a
subrange of the revisions? That will give you at least a way to limit
the 4 hours. Comparing with CVS is logical, but CVS has these values
precomputed: ready for you to use. So, obviously, it'll be faster than
any scheme which needs to do calculations to find the same


Received on 2010-01-08 14:17:17 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.