[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: stash (was Re: revert --force)

From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon_at_freemail.ru>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:54:15 +0300

Greetings, Tobias Hahn!

> I recognize that I meet some resistance here to my proposal...

> So what about a command svn stash (shamelessly stolen from git-stash) then? Example:

> $ svn stash save "Some dirty changes."

> This would add new files, save all local modifications away and then revert --force the tree. At this point the wc would be clean, so I could

I think I've answered it already.
Instead of taking the mess away, Subversion can move versioned files somewhere else.

--
WBR,
 Andrey Repin (anrdaemon_at_freemail.ru) 11.12.2009, <7:53>
Sorry for my terrible english...
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2429675
Please start new threads on the <users_at_subversion.apache.org> mailing list.
To subscribe to the new list, send an empty e-mail to <users-subscribe_at_subversion.apache.org>.
Received on 2009-12-11 05:55:54 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.