On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 15:07, Ryan Schmidt
<subversion-2009d_at_ryandesign.com> wrote:
>> svnsync is something ugly, I'm prefer use rsync over ssh (for fsfs repository).
>
> Dongsheng Song: If you're going to insult the software, you should provide justification for your insult. svnsync was specifically designed to synchronize repositories, and as far as I know many people use it successfully. Like most software, it has some shortcomings, but I don't think any of them are relevant here. In this case, the reason it did not work is that the revision is corrupt, as shown above.
>
> Shu Qingxiang: I don't know what you can do to fix this now, other than restore the corrupt revision from your backups -- but since you're talking about setting up a backup with svnsync, I'm fearing perhaps no backup exists.
>
I don't think I'm insult svnsync, I'm just said svnsync has some shortcoming.
Please see the mail archives:
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2419221
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3478
Long ago, I use svnsync meet some bad thing(I'm forgot now), so I
switch to svnsync over ssh.
In the worst circumstances, I can lost the latest version in theory.
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2425372
Please start new threads on the <users_at_subversion.apache.org> mailing list.
To subscribe to the new list, send an empty e-mail to <users-subscribe_at_subversion.apache.org>.
Received on 2009-11-30 09:23:47 CET