[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: windows junction points vs. SVN_67460

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:08:31 +0100

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 05:00:03PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2009, at 10:46, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 05:40:56PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >
> >> When you create a symbolic link on Windows you have to pass whether
> >> the link will point to a directory or to a file.
> >
> > NTFS junctions also?
>
> As far as I can tell, NTFS junctions are for directories only, and
> cannot be used for files.

Right, so all of this has quirks...

Well, I guess APR could always add an extra API we could use,
without causing the compatibility problems Bert mentioned.

The existing API would still be present and only support good
old UNIX symlinks, but new functions could be added to deal
with the various quirky windows "equivalents" (excuse my sarcasm :)

But I'm not an APR dev so I don't know what they would think of
this idea.

Stefan

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2416308

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-11-11 00:09:28 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.