[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: windows junction points vs. SVN_67460

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:58:33 +0100

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:47:15AM -0500, Bob Archer wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:20:40PM +0100, Ignacio G. T. wrote:
> > > El 9 Nov 2009 a las 10:57, thomas menzel escribió:
> > >
> > > > > Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> > > > > Subversion does not support junctions.
> > > >
> > > > well, ok - if that is the state now.
> > > > are you considering this for the future and if not, why not?
> > >
> > > I'm another happy (future) user of sjunctversion :-)
> >
> > This is platform specific and should be abstracted away by APR.
> > If APR does not support NTFS junctions, Subversion won't either.
> > Subversion's support for symlinks on UNIX also depends on APR.
> >
> > Stefan
>
> Do you know if apr hence svn supports symlinks on Windows?

I don't know.
Isn't an NTFS junction the closest equivalent to a symlink on Windows?

I don't know if APR supports NTFS junctions, just pointing out that
it is a prerequisite for such support in Subversion. If APR does not
support NTFS junctions yet, people should advocate for this support
to be added to APR (or better even create the necessary patches...)
If APR already supports NTFS junctions and this support is not used by
Subversion, we should at least open a corresponding issue in Subversion's
issue tracker if none exists yet.

Stefan

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2416196

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-11-10 16:59:35 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.