[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Performance/Reliablity: File System vs. Berkeley DB

From: Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:34:48 -0800

Rohit.K wrote:
> Among the options provided by Subversion, which one is more reliable and
> gives more performance, File System or Berkeley DB? How to decide which
> one is better in a particular situation?

http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.reposadmin.planning.html#svn.reposadmin.basics.backends

But you should go with fsfs unless you really have some reason to use bdb.

Regards,
Blair

-- 
Blair Zajac, Ph.D.
CTO, OrcaWare Technologies
<blair_at_orcaware.com>
Subversion training, consulting and support
http://www.orcaware.com/svn/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2415349
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-11-07 07:36:26 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.