[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion vs AccuRev

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer_at_bfk.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:58:49 +0000

* Stephen Connolly:

> 2009/10/21 Florian Weimer <fweimer_at_bfk.de>
>
>> * Bryan Wilkins:
>>
>> > I would like to get some of the users group opinions on
>> > AccuRev.
>>
>> Are AccuRev branches like Aegis branches, where changes on your base
>> branch shine through almost immediately?
>>
>
> You have to do an update... which requires keeping all your local changes
> first... which in my experience means that people are reluctant to do an
> update until all their changes are ready...

Okay, then I don't see what makes AccuRev's model so different.
Perhaps it's just a rehash of one of the older debates (where folks
were essentially debating whether a line is a set of points or a
solution of an equation).

Aegis was actually different: in general, your working copy (which is
not really yours alone) immediately reflects changes as they are
integrated into the base branch. (Local changes to updated files
prevent this immediate visibility.)

-- 
Florian Weimer                <fweimer_at_bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstra├če 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2409688
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-10-21 10:59:56 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.