[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Re: Subversion vs AccuRev

From: James Talbott <jtalbott_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:43:15 -0700 (PDT)


You are entitled to your opinion about AccuRev and I will not attempt to change your mind, but the statements you make below are patently false.

> in practice you can never trust promoting
> changes will have the correct effect.
> I have promoted files only to have them disappear from the stream I am
> promoting into as well as from the stream I am promoting from... only to be
> replaced by another version.
> There are the versions that we "kept" which AccuCrap refuses to give us
> back...
> There are sections of our history which AccuCrap can only give a guess as to
> what the repository looked like (due to problems with the metadata)

I can guess at what company you work for as I am only aware of a single customer who has ever migrated from AccuRev to SVN, and that was at the behest of an executive who is no longer even with that company. I would encourage Bryan to continue working with the excellent resources AccuRev provides to allow them to fully evaluate AccuRev's capabilities. At that point, if it isn't for your organization, as long as you made a fair decision we support it. But please be aware that the FUD Stephen is spreading is not the experience of 99.9% of our customers, and is in fact probably caused by a lack of education and interest on their part to adopting the solution.

~James Talbott
Senior Systems Engineer
AccuRev, Inc.


To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-10-08 18:45:14 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.