[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

SVN on i5 ( iSeries / System I)

From: matt farey <matt.farey_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:41:00 +0000

Hi

Sorry for my earlier mispost.

Does anyone have any experience of running an SVN server or similar on an i525?

If its a no go for reasons of cost or immaturity, should I consider recommending an SVN server on a linux OS on an i5 partion, with code then locally transferred to the test environment.

Does anyone know what collaborative change management applications IBM themselves offer for programmers on mid-range boxes?

Matt
------Original Message------
From: Andy Levy
To: Matt Farey
Cc: users_at_subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: merging advice
Sent: 5 Oct 2009 17:15

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:51, matt farey <matt.farey_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone know what SVN server options there are for IBM i5 V6R1

Please start a new thread of your own. Do not reply to an unrelated
discussion to ask your own question.

>
>________________________________
> From: Jeremy Mordkoff <jlm_at_ZeeVee.Com>
> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:20:35 -0400
> To: <users_at_subversion.tigris.org>
> Subject: merging advice
>
> We recently started using merge tracking. My first attempt at updating SVN
> to create all of the correct svn:mergeinfo records was somewhat successful.
> I was able in the end to run a svn mergeinfo report and get accurate  info
> back.
>
>
>
> But as part of all of this, I have ended up with some strange entries in my
> merge-info records, for example, this is for the top of /zcode/trunk:
>
>
>
> /repos/zcode/trunk:8*
>
> /zcode/branches/es_zvb_reset:9521-9652*
>
> /zcode/branches/rel_2_1:8309-9341*,9605*,9633*
>
> /zcode/branches/rel_2_2:9342-9680*
>
> /zcode/trunk:9-8308*,8603*,8612-8613*,8621*,8809*,8850*,8924*,9053*,9122*,9271*
>
>
>
> The first entry makes no sense to me as it includes the /repos part of the
> path which is a directory name on the server and NOT part of the path names
> in svn.
>
> The next three lines make sense
>
> The last line also does not make sense to me as there should be no need to
> record a merge from trunk to trunk.
>
>
>
> Should I be worried?
>
>
>
> JLM
>
>
>
>
>
> Jeremy Mordkoff
>
> Director, QA, IT & Release
>
> ZeeVee, Inc.
>
> One Monarch Drive | Littleton, MA 01460
>
> Office: 978.467.1395 x233 | Fax: 978.467.1404
>
> Mobile: 978-257-2183
>
> jlm_at_zeevee.com
>
> www.zeevee.com
>
>

Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2403830

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-10-05 19:41:47 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.