[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Comparison Collabnet and VisualSVN

From: Ari S <sadarjoen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:14:40 -0700 (PDT)

Hi Mark,

> I would not expect it to hurt performance, but could you have more
> logging enabled than the default Apache?  Ari have you done any kind
> of general comparison of the Apache configurations?  Maybe there is
> something different in the directives used in the two configurations
> that is causing the performance difference.

No, I haven't compared the configurations yet, but I think it's a good
idea to try to do that.
The amount of logging between CollabNet and VisualSVN is probably
different, so I will examine it in more detail.

Thanks!
Ari.

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2402503

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-10-01 15:15:31 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.