Re: Comparison Collabnet and VisualSVN

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Ari S <sadarjoen_at_gmail.com> wrote:

>> VisualSVN Server is just properly compiled and packaged original
>> Subversion. So you shouldn't have difference in performance between
>> VisualSVN Server and CollabNet.
>> Could you please provide a little bit more information about your
>> configuration: server os, client os, IPv4 or IPv4, etc. What operation
>> you are used to measure peformance?
>
> Oops, I discovered that I was using the CollabNet version 1.5.4 and
> VisualSVN Server based on SVN 1.6.3.
> Could that have made such a big difference???

I doubt it. Most changes in 1.6 were to the client layers, but even
setting that aside it would be rare for a server version to get
significantly slower.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2402016
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].