[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Comparison Collabnet and VisualSVN

From: Ari S <sadarjoen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:53:43 -0700 (PDT)

Dear all,

Currently, we are investigating a migration from CVS to Subversion.
For the Subversion server, we have compared specs of different
suppliers, and the shortlist has now been narrowed down to two:
CollabNet and VisualSVN Server.

When performing performance tests with the two, we found CollabNet to
be about 30% faster than VisualSVN server when using "out of the box
configurations" (as little changed as possible).

Has anyone else found similar (or totally different) figures?

Are there other pros and cons that should be considered in choosing
between these two vendors?

Could anyone perhaps point me to such performance (or feature)
comparison investigations done in the past by others?

Any information would be greatly appreciated.
Ari S.
Leiden, The Netherlands.


To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-29 15:56:03 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.