Re: We're still going on 'tree conflict' issue

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:18:34PM -0500, Paul Hammant wrote:
> OK so we can reproduce this for y'all now.
>
> We have a tiny svn repo (1.6.3) that could be attached to a bug-report
> and a single merge command that will show it immediately.
>
> Is that OK, or would the python bug reproductions scripts be better ?

You can try sending a zipped attachment of the repo to this list,
since it should not be too big.

And please mention any commands needed to reproduce.

Note again that *any* version of Subversion released as of today
will have this problem. The fix is present on the not-yet-released
1.6.x-r38000 branch only.

Thanks,
Stefan

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2396246

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-18 02:27:01 CEST