Re: back-end fsfs DB corruption? - attempt to merge uncovering it

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 05:49:39PM +0200, Stein Somers wrote:
> > svn diff http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.6.x@39163 \
> > http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.6.x-r38000 > 3.patch
>
> You've lost me somewhere there. Which is a good branch for users to
> investigate these aborting merges? 1.6.x_at_39163 1.6.x-r38000 or just 1.6.x?
>
> I tried using /trunk r39197, but that hangs midway checkout.

Oops.

> I tried the latest /trunk, but it begs for a file wc-queries.h

Have you run autogen.sh before running configure?

Meanwhile, Julian has done a catch-up merge with 1.6.x on the
1.6.x-r38000 branch, invalidating my diff commands.
So if you want to test the fix for the double-tc add, it's probably
best to just check out the 1.6.x-r38000 branch.

Stefan

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2395626

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-16 18:04:34 CEST