[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: back-end fsfs DB corruption? - attempt to merge uncovering it

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:03:44 +0100

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 05:49:39PM +0200, Stein Somers wrote:
> > svn diff http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.6.x@39163 \
> > http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.6.x-r38000 > 3.patch
> You've lost me somewhere there. Which is a good branch for users to
> investigate these aborting merges? 1.6.x_at_39163 1.6.x-r38000 or just 1.6.x?
> I tried using /trunk r39197, but that hangs midway checkout.


> I tried the latest /trunk, but it begs for a file wc-queries.h

Have you run autogen.sh before running configure?

Meanwhile, Julian has done a catch-up merge with 1.6.x on the
1.6.x-r38000 branch, invalidating my diff commands.
So if you want to test the fix for the double-tc add, it's probably
best to just check out the 1.6.x-r38000 branch.



To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-16 18:04:34 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.