[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: annoying "Attempt to add tree conflict that already exists"

From: Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2009b_at_ryandesign.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:55:13 -0500

On Sep 15, 2009, at 19:28, Paul Hammant wrote:

> Nope, fails as well in the same way.
>
> ldd still reports it as "Not an dynamic executable"

Out of curiosity, what is it then, if not a dynamic executable? What
does "file" say about it?

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2395311

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-16 02:56:06 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Andras Igneczi: "ntfs naming conventions"
Previous message: Paul Hammant: "Re: annoying "Attempt to add tree conflict that already exists" [ was "back-end fsfs DB corruption? - attempt to merge uncovering it" ]"
In reply to: Paul Hammant: "Re: annoying "Attempt to add tree conflict that already exists" [ was "back-end fsfs DB corruption? - attempt to merge uncovering it" ]"
Next in thread: Stefan Sperling: "Re: annoying "Attempt to add tree conflict that already exists""
Reply: Stefan Sperling: "Re: annoying "Attempt to add tree conflict that already exists""

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.