Stefan,
Building 1.6.x-r38000 (requires libtool install, sqllite stuff, etc)
makes a Svn. Testing that one (again hard coded path), yields the
same halt point:
I note your following email and will try that too.
Regards,
- Paul
On Sep 15, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:39:46AM -0500, Paul Hammant wrote:
>> Stefan,
>>
>> We rebuilt Svn based on 1.6.5 and those two patches, but it still the
>> same :-(
>>
>> Here is the output. It is the same as the OP.
>>
>> svn: Attempt to add tree conflict that already exists
>> svn: Error reading spooled REPORT request response
>>
>> We confirmed that we had the right svn, by hard-coding the path to
>> executable, and confirming it was the right thing by way of 'svn --
>> version' before invocation.
>>
>> Thus, Svn 1.6.6 IMO is going to exhibit some of the same tree-
>> conflict
>> issues as 1.6.3.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Strange.
>
> Are you sure you've applied the patches correctly?
> If you run diff -ruN on the source tree you have patched and
> one that is fresh and unpatched, does the diff you get look
> the same as the one you downloaded from the svn.collab.net
> repository?
>
> You could also try checking out the 1.6.x-r38000 branch and
> build that (run the autogen.sh script, then build as usual).
> svn co http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.6.x-r38000
>
> If you are really sure that the fix does not work, can you provide
> a script which starts out with an empty repository and issues the
> necessary svn commands to trigger the problem?
> That would help a lot.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2395201
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-15 20:30:29 CEST