RE: Re: back-end fsfs DB corruption? - attempt to merge uncovering it

Great, thanks!

I'm working with Paul on this. Will we need to upgrade the server to take advantage of these bug fixes?

We're on 1.6.3 for the server currently.

> There are 3 bugs you have run into, all of which are known
> and fixed:
>
> 1) Tree conflicts can only be resolved to 'working' state right now,
> and svn should not be fooling users into thinking 'theirs-full'
> etc. applies to tree conflicts.
>
> 2) The "attempt to add tree conflict that already exists" error
> does not print the path of the double-tree conflict victim.
>
> 3) It is possible to corrupt the working copy during a tree conflict
> which involves a replace. This is what is stopping your merge.
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2394781

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-14 23:06:24 CEST