[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: C# AssemblyInfo integration

From: Yves Goergen <nospam.list_at_unclassified.de>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:00:58 +0200

On 02.09.2009 16:57 CE(S)T, David Weintraub wrote:
> That's a shame really because you would find CruiseControl.NET to be
> extemely useful in your development.

Hm, from those two entry pages, CCNet doesn't look too useful to our
project. We don't need a build server. And we do commit every few hours
already. And we can talk to each other if anyone wants to do big

> You should not be "pushing the build button" for official builds. You
> should not be doing any manual steps in order to produce your builds.
> That's not only error prone, but makes the build process totally
> dependent upon you. Official builds should take place on a server
> specifically designed for that purpose and should be 100% automated.

Everyone who works on the project (1 to 3 people) can build the
application and publish the binary. There's no need for a highly
sophisticated build server environment. Testing was not paid by the
client so we don't do it a lot other then what a developer usually does.

And the SVN revision has the only purpose that we could easily analyse
any errors reported by the client without asking a lot about their
software version. The complete version is included in the error report
file so we could start right away, if the code revision is relevant to
an error.

Yves Goergen "LonelyPixel" <nospam.list_at_unclassified.de>
Visit my web laboratory at http://beta.unclassified.de
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-02 22:01:53 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.