Re: C# AssemblyInfo integration

On 02.09.2009 16:57 CE(S)T, David Weintraub wrote:
> That's a shame really because you would find CruiseControl.NET to be
> extemely useful in your development.

Hm, from those two entry pages, CCNet doesn't look too useful to our
project. We don't need a build server. And we do commit every few hours
already. And we can talk to each other if anyone wants to do big
refactoring.

> You should not be "pushing the build button" for official builds. You
> should not be doing any manual steps in order to produce your builds.
> That's not only error prone, but makes the build process totally
> dependent upon you. Official builds should take place on a server
> specifically designed for that purpose and should be 100% automated.

Everyone who works on the project (1 to 3 people) can build the
application and publish the binary. There's no need for a highly
sophisticated build server environment. Testing was not paid by the
client so we don't do it a lot other then what a developer usually does.

And the SVN revision has the only purpose that we could easily analyse
any errors reported by the client without asking a lot about their
software version. The complete version is included in the error report
file so we could start right away, if the code revision is relevant to
an error.

-- 
Yves Goergen "LonelyPixel" <nospam.list_at_unclassified.de>
Visit my web laboratory at http://beta.unclassified.de
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2390413
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].