[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Svn Update Error REPORT <repo address>: 200 OK (<http myServer>)

From: Bob Archer <bob.archer_at_amsi.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:56:29 -0400

> Yes of course, thanks bob, I prefer a funny answer than no answer.
> But, thinking that we have only one working copy (shared on a network
> drive), I think is easy for me to delete a working copy and making a
> new one, but thinking in development teams having many working copies,
> they all have to delete and re do a working copy? I just can't belive
> it! Is this normal?

Well, that might be your problem right there. You really should not share a working copy. Each dev should have his own.

As I said, no this is not common. Usually you just update and the first time you touch the WC with the new version it is updated. Oh, and going from 1.6.x to 1.6.y doesn't actually change the working copy format. It is only changed from 1.x to 1.y revs.



To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-01 15:57:39 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.