Re: Coping with BerkeleyDB Upgrades

On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Mark Reibert wrote:

> I too have been using SVN since the days when BDB was the default.
> Personally, I think one of the best arguments for FSFS is simply to avoid
> this kind of BDB dependency problem.

Mark,

   I suppose that part of my problem with svn was my looking at it as a tool
that was used intensively during earlier stages of application development,
then not used for a long time. Other than security upgrades I paid no
attention to any changes that occurred. As a result I was unaware of the
change in default backends and of the issues that could arise with BDB.

> There are a couple of ways to handle this:

   Because I have the completed portion of the application working it was no
big deal to remove the old repository and start over using a fresh one. Just
to ensure no future issues, I specified the fs-type during the creation.

Thanks,

Rich

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2389754

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-09-01 15:33:30 CEST