You are right. I am just confusing myself and the system if I go ahead with
this. Let me rethink this over.
Thanks
/lim/
Ryan Schmidt-60 wrote:
>
> On Aug 11, 2009, at 04:14, TH Lim wrote:
>
>> I totally understand "Subversion is to retain all your history".
>>
>> To elaborate, say, I have 100 revisions. I find tat i don't need
>> revisions
>> 0:90. So from tomorrow onwards I want to keep revisions 91 to 100.
>> I could
>> do that by dumping 91:100 and load into a new repository. Doing so,
>> reset my
>> revision number to 1. Basically, I do not want to upset the
>> revision number
>> in my local workspace which is clocked at revision 100. I don't
>> know if this
>> is a good idea to retain the revision.
>
> I understand what you're saying, but Subversion is not designed to
> work like that. Even if you keep the same revision numbers, if each
> revision is not identical in the new repository to what it was in the
> old repository (which it won't be for those empty revisions you'd
> have to create at the beginning to keep your later revision numbers
> the same), then it is not the same repository as before, therefore
> you have to assign it a new UUID, therefore you have to discard all
> working copies and check out new ones.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2382401
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
> [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Resizing-an-existing-repository-while-keeping-the-revision-numbering-tp24603057p24914844.html
Sent from the Subversion Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2382415
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-08-11 12:09:39 CEST