Dan Stromberg wrote on Mon, 10 Aug 2009 at 14:15 -0700:
> I got bit by the change in semantics of svn checkout -N, but replacing
> that with --ignore-externals appears to be giving the old -N behavior
> :) So it wasn't too hard to get past.
>
-N was deprecated in favour of --depth.
> -=BUT=-, I've still got the bad peg revisions problem. :(
>
> I'm beginning to think I should take this to the dev list, but it
> seems like a difficult to replicate issue unless you happen to have a
> copy of our repo, which gets into the issue of whether we can share it
> long enough to get a fix.
>
> Can anyone on the list confirm that this is a new issue before I bug
> the dev's? It sounds like they're tired of simple and known issues
> coming up on-list.
>
Before taking this to dev@, can you show *exactly* what you're doing,
including the command that gives different results on the two copies of
the repository, and its outputs in both cases? (Plus, say how you
generated the second copy given the first.)
I haven't found that information anywhere upthread (but I haven't read
all of it). Also, the subject says something about peg revs...
Thanks,
Daniel
> Thanks!
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2382208
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2382247
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-08-11 01:05:18 CEST