On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 01:49:13PM +0200, KYLEE_at_bksv.com wrote:
> It works the same way when iam not in dry run.
> The results were identical.
What about the other thing I suggested?
> > The merge source is like:
> > \Suites\xxxx
> > \Suites\yyyy
> >
> > The merge destination is like:
> > \Suites\zzzz
> >
> > I want to achieve this outcome:
> > \Suites\xxxx
> > \Suites\yyyy
> > \Suites\zzzz
> >
> > The command line i use is:
> > c:\Builds\Source\Applications\ApplicationsTest>svn merge --dry-run
> > --accept mine-full -r 95976:HEAD http://svn/test <http://svn/test>
> > /trunk/Applications/ApplicationsTest_at_HEAD
> > <mailto:vn/Reflex/trunk/Applications/ApplicationsTest_at_HEAD> .
> > ( where HEAD revision is ~15000 )
> > ( where revision 95976 is the initial creation of \Suites\xxxx and
> > \Suites\yyyy )
> >
> > But i kept getting this kinda merge:
> > Skipped 'Suites\xxxx\aaaaa
> > Skipped 'Suites\xxxx\aaaaa\Log'
> > Skipped missing target: 'Suites\xxxx\aaaaa\qqqqq.cpp
>
> Does it work if you go back one revision to 95975?
tyler
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2382096
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-08-10 16:41:48 CEST