If you just loaded a dump into the repo then there is nothing to do, it is as compressed as it can be... IIRC.
BOb
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Navarette [mailto:ray.navarette_at_pb.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 8:55 AM
> To: Hyrum K. Wright; Olivier Sannier
> Cc: users_at_subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: RE: 1.6.3: problems with svnadmin 'pack' and 'upgrade' on
> windows
>
> Thanks Hyrum and Olivier,
>
> Sorry, but I should have mentioned earlier that I actually tried a dump
> of the original repo and load into a freshly created (with 1.6) repo.
> This produced the same result, the command completed immediately and
> produced no output.
>
> Any other thoughts?
>
> Thanks again
> ray
>
> Ray Navarette Associate Software Engineer
> Pitney Bowes Business Insight
> One Global View |Troy, NY 12180
> ray_navarette_at_mapinfo.com
> www.mapinfo.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hyrum K. Wright [mailto:hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 5:01 PM
> To: Ray Navarette
> Cc: users_at_subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: 1.6.3: problems with svnadmin 'pack' and 'upgrade' on
> windows
>
>
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Ray Navarette wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Hopefully, I'm doing something stupid and one of you can help me.
> > If that's not the case, then I have no idea what's going on.
> >
> > I've recently upgraded our server from 1.4 to 1.6. I'd like to
> > upgrade the repository to 1.6 also to take advantage of FSFS packing
> > and merge tracking. So, as a sanity check, I wanted to first test
> > out this upgrade. To do so, I did an 'svnadmin hotcopy' of the
> > repository. This completed with what seems to be success (I can
> > check out a working copy). I then attempt to upgrade with 'svnadmin
> > upgrade' on the repo. This completes almost immediately with no
> > text output to the console (is this expected?). It seems that the
> > format file gets changed, but I'm surprised its this quick. Similar
> > result with 'svnadmin pack', immediate completion and no output. I
> > also expect there to be many less rev files (1 if my understanding
> > is correct) after packing. There is still 1 file per revision.
>
> If you are upgrading from 1.4, the repository won't be sharded, which
> is a perquisite for FSFS packing. You'll need to shard the
> repository, either by copying it using svnsync or using the (not-quite-
> supported) fsfs-reshard.py script.
>
> Once you've got a sharded 1.6 repository, packing it should then
> consolidate all completed shards.
>
> -Hyrum
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessage
> Id=2377361
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-
> unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2377366
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-07-31 15:00:40 CEST