[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svnsync: Cannot accept non-LF line endings in 'svn:ignore' propert

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:09:50 +0100

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 07:55:51PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Stefan Sperling<stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:21:58AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Marc Lustig<ml_at_marclustig.com> wrote:
> >> > svnsync: Cannot accept non-LF line endings in 'svn:ignore' property
> >>
> >> Did you ever get past this? I just addressed it in a big repository
> >> that I was trying to upgrade by using the latest subversion 'trunk'
> >> code, nominally labeled 1.7.0 internally, to build a working svnsync
> >> that addresses this issue. I'm also hoping that 1.6.4 will be released
> >> as quickly as possible to address this.
> >
> > This was fixed in 1.6.3.
> > You don't have build trunk or wait for 1.6.4 for this.
>
> Odd. It didn't work for me on RHEL 4 or RHEL 5, using the RPMforge
> distribution of subversion 1.6.3 or a locally built one for RHEL 4.

But it should work.

And you said it worked for you using trunk, right?

> > Version 1.6.3
> > (22 Jun 2009, from /branches/1.6.x)
> > http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/tags/1.6.3
> >
> >  User-visible changes:
> >  [...]
> >  * make svnsync normalize svn:* props to LF line endings (issue #3404)
> >  [...]
> >
> > Stefan
>
> It's a new feature: maybe I tripped over a bug for svn:ignore, and not
> for simpler characteristics such as svn:log?

No, it normalizes all svn:* props. All of them.
I just checked the 1.6.3 release code again to make sure.

I'm not saying that there is no problem, just pointing out that to
the best of our knowledge this should have been fixed with 1.6.3.

Can you provide more information or otherwise help to diagnose the
problem more precisely? Such as a public test repository to sync
from which contains the property in question? Then others could test
with their 1.6.3 clients to see if they can reproduce your problem.

Stefan
Received on 2009-07-23 11:10:45 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.