RE: How to resolve tree conficts with incoming move and local change
From: Thomas S. Trias <tomtrias_at_artizan.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
James,
I ended up doing something remarkably similar using PowerShell. Perhaps if the interactive merge prompted one to resolve the previous tree conflict upon detection of a duplicate (or if the merge - update? - in general actually coalesced a sequence on tree conflicts into their logical result?), then we wouldn't need to do things like this?
I understand the rationale behind not allowing duplicate tree conflicts, but perhaps some of the more common cases (e.g. several revisions applied to a moved directory in a branch) could be treated as a single logical tree conflict?
Thanks,
-- Thomas S. Trias Senior Developer Artizan Internet Services http://www.artizan.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2374485 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].Received on 2009-07-22 18:30:20 CEST |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.